The Congressional experience was interesting. Japan has the longest lifespan of any country in the world, has comprehensive healthcare coverage for all citizens, and has very low healthcare costs - less than half the US expenditure per person per year. It's challenging to highlight lessons learned from the US which has highly variable quality, high cost, and 40 million uninsured.
Luckily, the Japanese agreed that Healthcare IT is to be embraced for quality/safety/efficiency, cost reduction, and job creation.
I described the US Healthcare IT program as guided by 5 goals
*Improving quality, safety, efficiency, and reducing health disparities
*Engage patients and families in their health care
*Improve care coordination
*Improve population and public health
*Ensure adequate privacy and security protections for personal health information
achieved with 5 tactics
* Policy (Health Information Technology Policy Committee)
Certification and Standards (Health Information Technology Standards Committee)
Privacy and Security Tiger Team
Regional Extension Centers and Health Information Exchanges ($2 billion)
Incentives to adopt and achieve “Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Records” ($21 billion)
The Japanese legislators asked great questions about the role of genomics, the role of telemedicine, and the potential for job creation. I remain optimistic that the Japanese will consider their own healthcare IT stimulus program.
The all day Global Health Forum included several important key points:
In Japan over the past 50 years, the economy has shifted from agricultural to industrial, from rural to urban, and from communities bonded together to often impersonal cities without support systems of the family and friends. Many Japanese die alone and do not have the eldercare they need.
25% of Japanese are over 65 and over the next 50 years, the problem will get worse, such that 2 working age individuals will be paying for the care of 1 retirement age individual. The Japanese birth rate is 1.3, so the Japanese population will fall rapidly over the next 50 years, reducing the workforce and tax base. Immigration is very limited in Japan, so diminishing Japanese and limited foreign workers with result in a crisis of public funding for healthcare . The Japanese will try to balance cost, quality, and healthcare access with available funds, but even now there is gap between the funds received from workers and the funds paid out to pay for the care of the elderly.
IT can provide some mitigation of the problem. Japan has one of the best wired and wireless networks in the world. These can be leveraged to create virtual communities/social networks of carers as well as support homecare including telemedicine and remote monitoring. IT can provide data for population health and care coordination.
At present Japan has many policies which discourage the use of the public internet for healthcare, data exchange, and homecare. Changing policy/regulation and providing incentives to move care to the home is an important next step. Focusing on wellness and day to day life rather than just treatment of disease is also an important tactic. Japan describes this as a transition from "medical policymaking" to a "health policymaking".
The session on healthcare IT included my presentation, a presentation from Dr. Akiyama of Tokyo University, and a presentation from Intel.
Many of themes in Japanese society apply to the US. Our aging baby boomers will require more care than the Medicare system can afford. Secretary Sebelius has said that 1/3 of US healthcare is redundant and unnecessary. I look forward to continued exchange of ideas between the US and Japanese. We are meeting again this July at CSIS in Washington.